Introduction

California’s Responsible Textile Recovery Act of 2024 (SB 707) is the first extended producer responsibility law for textiles in the United States, requiring apparel and textile producers with over $1 million in annual global sales to register with a state-approved Producer Responsibility Organization by July 1, 2026. Signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom in September 2024 and administered by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), the law makes producers financially responsible for the collection, repair, reuse, and recycling of their products throughout their entire lifecycle. For any brand, manufacturer, importer, or retailer selling covered textile or apparel articles into California, the compliance clock is now running.

Key Takeaways

• California SB 707 is the first mandatory textile EPR law in the United States, signed into law in September 2024 and now entering its first active compliance phase.
• All covered producers with more than $1 million in annual global sales must register with Landbell USA, the state-approved Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO), by July 1, 2026. The registration fee for the 2026-2027 cycle is a flat $1,000 per producer.
• “Producer” is defined through a four-tier hierarchy: the obligation falls first to the brand owner or manufacturer, then to the exclusive licensee, then to the importer, and finally to the distributor, retailer, or wholesaler.
• Eco-modulated fees, which will penalize difficult-to-recycle materials such as blended fibers and PFAS-treated fabrics while rewarding durable and recyclable designs, will apply from full program implementation in 2030. However, product design decisions made today will determine the fee levels companies pay then.
• The data required for SB 707 PRO compliance — fiber type, material composition, sales volume by Harmonized Tariff Schedule number — is structurally identical to the data required for accurate Scope 3 Category 12 GHG reporting under the GHG Protocol.

What Is California SB 707 and Why Does It Mark a Turning Point for the US Textile Industry?

California SB 707 establishes the first statewide extended producer responsibility framework for textiles in the United States, shifting the financial and operational burden of textile waste management from municipal governments and taxpayers directly onto the producers that design, manufacture, and sell covered products.

According to CalRecycle’s 2021 Disposal Facility-based Waste Characterization Data, 1.2 million tons of textiles were disposed of in California in that year alone, making textiles the fastest-growing component of the state’s landfills and accounting for 3 percent of total landfill waste. At the federal level, the US Environmental Protection Agency has reported that the US recycled only 14.7 percent of all textiles in 2018, despite the fact that almost 95 percent of all textile products are recyclable. SB 707 is designed to close that gap by making producers financially accountable for the entire product lifecycle.

The Responsible Textile Recovery Act: Scope, Purpose, and Regulatory Authority

Enacted as Chapter 864 of the Statutes of 2024, the Responsible Textile Recovery Act covers apparel and textile articles sold, offered for sale, or distributed for sale in or into California. Covered products span an extensive range, from undergarments, athletic wear, and formal wear to blankets, curtains, towels, bedding, and tablecloths. CalRecycle serves as the lead regulatory authority overseeing rulemaking, compliance, and enforcement. On February 27, 2026, CalRecycle approved Landbell USA as California’s sole Producer Responsibility Organization to administer the program, following a competitive application process that also included the Circular Textile Alliance and the Textile Renewal Alliance.

Who Qualifies as a Producer Under SB 707 — and Who Is Exempt?

SB 707 defines “producer” through a tiered hierarchy designed to ensure that at least one party in the California supply chain bears compliance responsibility for every covered product. Understanding where your organization sits in that hierarchy is the first step in determining your July 1, 2026 obligations.

The Hierarchical Producer Definition: Manufacturer, Importer, Distributor, and Retailer Obligations

According to the Responsible Textile Recovery Act as analyzed by Holland & Knight, the obligation falls first to the manufacturer of a covered product who owns or is the licensee of the brand or trademark under which the product is sold or distributed in California. If no such person exists within the state, the obligation transfers to the exclusive licensee of that brand or trademark, regardless of whether the trademark is registered. If there is still no qualifying entity, the obligation passes to the importer of the covered product, regardless of sale or distribution arrangements. Finally, if none of the above applies, the obligation falls to the distributor, retailer, or wholesaler that sells the product into California.

This tiered structure means that even companies that do not manufacture their products directly, and even companies headquartered outside the United States, may carry producer obligations under California law if they are the entity placing covered products on the California market.

The $1 Million Exemption Threshold: Which Businesses Fall Outside the Law

Two categories of sellers are exempt from SB 707 obligations. First, sellers who sell only secondhand covered products in California are not subject to the law. Second, businesses with less than $1 million in aggregate annual global sales are exempt. As noted by AMCIRC, this threshold is deliberately broad: many brands that do not consider themselves large producers will qualify once total global sales are counted. Companies should assess their global revenue figure, not just their California revenue, before concluding they fall outside scope.

How Does the Eco-Modulated Fee Structure Work — and Which Products Will Cost More?

SB 707’s eco-modulated fee system is the mechanism through which California translates producer responsibility into a direct financial incentive for sustainable product design. While producer fees will not begin until full program implementation in 2030, understanding the fee logic now is operationally critical: the product design and sourcing decisions made during 2026 and 2027 collection development cycles will directly determine the fee levels that apply once the Stewardship Plan is approved.

Malus Fees: PFAS-Treated Fabrics, Blended Fibers, and Non-Recyclable Materials

The intent of the eco-modulated fee, as set out in the statute and confirmed by Holland & Knight’s legal analysis, is to disincentivize production of materials that are difficult to recycle by charging producers higher fees. Products that will face elevated fees include those made from mixed-material blends such as poly-cotton-elastane combinations that cannot be easily separated during recycling, PFAS-treated fabrics that create contamination issues in the recycling stream, and other materials categorized as incongruent with the program’s collection, repair, reuse, and recycling objectives.

Bonus Reductions: Durability, Repairability, and Post-Consumer Recycled Content

Conversely, producers that have existing collection, repair, reuse, or recycling programs in place benefit from reduced fees, as do those whose products are designed for durability, repairability, or contain high percentages of post-consumer recycled content. This creates a direct financial pathway from sustainable product design to lower compliance cost. Sourcing teams should factor an estimated end-of-life fee into landed duty paid cost calculations now, before the final fee schedule is set, because products with complex synthetic compositions may become measurably more expensive to place on the California market than natural fiber or mono-material alternatives once the PRO begins invoicing.

How Does SB 707 Compliance Data Connect to Scope 3 and ESG Reporting?

SB 707 is not only a waste management regulation. For companies that are simultaneously managing Scope 3 emissions disclosures, the data infrastructure required for PRO compliance and the data infrastructure required for accurate GHG reporting are structurally identical. Building one system to serve both obligations is both operationally efficient and strategically sound.

Fiber Type, Sales Volume, and HTS Data: The Overlap Between PRO Reporting and GHG Accounting

Under the SB 707 statute, annual reporting submitted to the PRO must include the quantity and weight of covered products sold into California, broken down by fiber type category and Harmonized Tariff Schedule number, alongside the total weight of covered products collected, disaggregated by fiber type. This is the same material composition and supply volume data that forms the foundation of product lifecycle GHG accounting. Companies that have already built fiber-level product data systems for carbon accounting purposes are in a significantly stronger position to meet PRO reporting requirements with minimal incremental effort.

End-of-Life Treatment of Sold Products: Scope 3 Category 12 and What SB 707 Triggers

Under the GHG Protocol, Scope 3 Category 12 covers the emissions associated with the end-of-life treatment of sold products, including the waste processing of products sold to consumers in the reporting year. SB 707 directly addresses this category by requiring producers to fund and support a statewide collection, repair, reuse, and recycling infrastructure. Producers that extend product lifespans through repair programs, or that shift material composition toward recyclable mono-materials and post-consumer recycled content, will reduce the volume and carbon intensity of end-of-life textile waste attributable to their product portfolio. This reduces their Scope 3 Category 12 footprint while simultaneously lowering their SB 707 eco-modulated fee obligations. The regulatory and ESG accounting incentives are aligned.

For organizations managing IFRS S2 or CSRD disclosures alongside their US EPR obligations, this convergence matters at the platform level. Product lifecycle management systems that feed fiber composition, sales volume, and material recovery data to the PRO can be configured to output the same data to GHG accounting systems, eliminating duplicative data collection workflows and reducing the risk of inconsistency between regulatory filings and sustainability disclosures.

What Must Producers Do Now — and What Happens If They Miss the July 1 Deadline?

The July 1, 2026 registration deadline is not the beginning of full program enforcement, but it is the first concrete compliance obligation under SB 707, and missing it carries both legal exposure and strategic cost. Producers that register before the deadline gain participation rights in shaping program rules during the critical early design phase. Those that do not may find themselves subject to a fee structure and collection infrastructure they had no role in defining.

Three Immediate Actions Before July 1, 2026: Registration, Brand Listing, and Data Inventory

First, confirm whether your organization meets the covered producer threshold by reviewing global annual sales figures against the $1 million exemption and identifying where your entity sits in the four-tier producer hierarchy for your California product lines. Second, complete registration with Landbell USA via the registration portal at landbellusa.com. The 2026-2027 registration cycle requires a flat annual fee of $1,000 per producer to fund the Pre-Implementation phase, including the statewide Needs Assessment and system development. Third, begin an internal data inventory covering product categories by fiber type, Harmonized Tariff Schedule classifications for covered products sold into California, and existing collection, repair, or reuse programs that may qualify for eco-modulated fee reductions. This inventory is the foundation of both PRO compliance and any future GHG accounting exercise tied to product end-of-life.

Penalties: Up to $10,000 Per Day for Unintentional Violations, $50,000 Per Day for Intentional Violations

Once the PRO’s Stewardship Plan is approved by CalRecycle, or by July 1, 2030 at the latest, whichever comes first, civil penalties apply to noncompliant producers. CalRecycle will maintain a publicly available list of compliant producers on its website. Administrative civil penalties reach up to $10,000 per day for unintentional or unknowing violations, and up to $50,000 per day for intentional or willful violations. For companies with significant California sales volumes, the accumulated penalty exposure from a delayed compliance decision substantially exceeds the cost of early registration and data preparation.

The AAFA Legal Challenge: What the PRO Litigation Means for Your Compliance Strategy

On March 27, 2026, the American Apparel and Footwear Association filed a challenge in Sacramento County Superior Court contesting CalRecycle’s selection of Landbell USA as the PRO, contending that CalRecycle failed to follow the statute in its selection process. As of the time of writing, the court has not yet responded to the filing. AMCIRC’s implementation tracker notes that this challenge does not alter the July 1, 2026 producer registration deadline, which remains in effect. Companies monitoring the litigation should treat compliance preparation as a parallel track: regardless of the outcome of the AAFA challenge, SB 707 itself remains law, and the underlying obligation to participate in an approved PRO is unaffected. Engagement with legal counsel is appropriate for companies seeking to understand the potential implications of the litigation on registration timing.

Conclusion

California SB 707 establishes a new compliance obligation that reaches every apparel brand, manufacturer, importer, and retailer with more than $1 million in global sales placing covered textile or apparel products on the California market. The July 1, 2026 registration deadline marks the transition from legislative planning to active program participation. Beyond the immediate registration requirement, the eco-modulated fee structure that takes effect from 2030 onward creates a direct financial incentive to invest in product-level material composition data, recyclable design practices, and supply chain transparency today. That investment serves SB 707 compliance, Scope 3 GHG accounting, and the broader ESG disclosure obligations that California’s executive leadership will increasingly face across multiple regulatory frameworks simultaneously.

Why Work with ASUENE Inc.?

ASUENE is a key player in carbon accounting, offering a comprehensive platform that measures, reduces, and reports emissions, including Scope 1-3. ASUENE serves over 50,000 clients worldwide, providing an all-in-one solution that integrates GHG accounting, ESG supply chain management, a Carbon Credit exchange platform, and third-party verification.

ASUENE supports companies in achieving net-zero goals through advanced technology, consulting services, and an extensive network.