Overview

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), passed in August 2022, is the United States’ most comprehensive climate and sustainability investment policy to date. With over $369 billion allocated to clean energy, emissions reduction, and environmental justice, the IRA has repositioned the U.S. as one of the global climate leaders. However, with political tides shifting in Washington following the 2024 elections, the IRA faces an uncertain future. This article explores the IRA’s purpose, its global sustainability impact, and the potential ramifications if a new Trump administration dismantles it.

The Inflation Reduction Act: Cornerstone of U.S. Climate Policy

The IRA is structured around four major climate pillars:

• Clean Energy Tax Credits: These long-term incentives support wind, solar, nuclear, battery storage, and green hydrogen production. Notably, the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and Production Tax Credit (PTC) provide decade-long visibility for clean energy developers.
• Electrification and Efficiency: Subsidies and rebates help consumers and businesses adopt electric vehicles, heat pumps, and energy-efficient appliances. The High-Efficiency Electric Home Rebate Act (HEEHRA) has been particularly impactful.
• Industrial Decarbonization: The IRA offers tax credits for carbon capture, sustainable aviation fuel, and clean manufacturing. It aims to scale domestic production and reduce supply chain emissions.
• Environmental Justice and Green Banks: The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), known as the “green bank,” allocates $27 billion to fund local sustainability projects in disadvantaged communities.

By early 2025, the IRA had catalyzed over $400 billion in private-sector investment, significantly expanded clean tech production, and supported the creation of tens of thousands of green jobs.

IRA’s Role in Global Sustainability

1. Emissions Reduction Leadership

The IRA is projected to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030 compared to 2005 levels. This is primarily due to a dramatic acceleration in clean electricity deployment, electrification of transport and buildings, and emissions reductions in industrial sectors. Independent models, including those from the Department of Energy and Rhodium Group, have corroborated these figures, suggesting that the IRA placed the U.S. on the most aggressive emissions reduction trajectory in its history. Without it, experts warn that progress could be delayed by a decade or more.

2. International Investment Dynamics

The act incentivized global companies to establish U.S.-based operations to access a new wave of clean energy tax credits, including those tied to domestic manufacturing. This policy design attracted substantial investments from firms based in South Korea, Germany, and Sweden, particularly in sectors such as electric vehicles, battery production, and clean hydrogen. These firms responded to the IRA’s clear signals of market stability and demand, often relocating or expanding production capacity in U.S. regions like the Midwest and Southeast. The IRA’s influence extended abroad, prompting the EU to launch its Green Deal Industrial Plan and Canada to counter with its Clean Economy Investment Tax Credit. These responses aimed to prevent capital flight and ensure global competitiveness in the energy transition.

3. Boost to ESG and Corporate Strategy

With incentives tied directly to carbon mitigation, the IRA created strong economic reasons for companies to embed sustainability in core business strategies. This reshaping of corporate behavior has manifested in widespread adoption of Scope 1–3 emissions accounting, the rollout of internal carbon pricing, and the electrification of corporate vehicle fleets. Power purchase agreements for clean electricity surged, while companies in heavy-emitting industries began pilot projects in carbon capture and green hydrogen. Additionally, investor expectations evolved in parallel, with financial institutions increasingly scrutinizing how companies leverage federal climate incentives. By 2025, many global firms had revised their interim decarbonization targets to capitalize on the opportunities introduced by the IRA.

The Trump Factor: Risks to IRA Continuity

Donald Trump and Republican leadership have signaled strong opposition to the IRA, labeling it a wasteful climate subsidy. With Trump now back in office, several policy changes are already underway. Legislative repeal is now a serious threat, as the GOP may leverage its congressional influence to repeal or severely weaken IRA funding mechanisms. Regulatory rollbacks are expected to proceed through executive orders that nullify implementation guidance issued by the Treasury Department, Department of Energy, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Additionally, enforcement may be significantly weakened. Even without formal repeal, the administration could delay grant disbursements, alter eligibility criteria, or freeze budget allocations, all of which could derail the act’s effectiveness.

What Happens If the IRA Goes Away?

1. Clean Energy Deployment Slows

Projections from the Princeton REPEAT Project suggest that without the IRA, U.S. clean energy deployment could decline by 25–40%. This would significantly undermine power sector decarbonization, as many planned solar, wind, and battery storage projects may no longer be economically viable without the tax incentives and subsidies provided by the IRA. Grid modernization efforts that hinge on renewable integration would also stall, potentially locking in fossil fuel infrastructure for years to come. Rural areas that were beginning to benefit from job creation and economic revitalization linked to clean energy projects could see these gains reversed, exacerbating regional inequality.

2. Disruption of Green Supply Chains

Global firms that expanded into the U.S. to benefit from IRA incentives may reassess or scale back their operations. Companies involved in battery manufacturing, solar module production, and electric vehicle supply chains could shift investments back to Asia or the EU, where policy support is stronger or more predictable. This not only risks reducing domestic production capacity, but also undermines national energy security and weakens the U.S. strategic position in the global clean tech race. A rollback could create uncertainty that chills long-term investment and deters innovation.

3. ESG and Corporate Climate Ambitions at Risk

Corporates may delay or cancel capital-intensive decarbonization projects without the certainty of government support. Internal carbon pricing, science-based target adoption, and Scope 3 mitigation strategies that rely on incentives could slow. The signal to financial markets would be equally concerning: ESG investing, already facing political pushback in parts of the U.S., could suffer from a broader credibility issue. Companies may revert to minimal compliance strategies rather than progressive sustainability leadership, weakening both transparency and impact in the ESG ecosystem.

4. Environmental Justice Reversal

Programs like the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and Justice40, which prioritize funding for historically marginalized communities, could be defunded or severely curtailed. These programs support local air pollution reduction, energy access, and workforce development in communities disproportionately affected by climate change and industrial pollution. Their rollback would mean fewer community solar installations, delayed building retrofits in low-income neighborhoods, and missed opportunities to create green jobs in areas most in need. The net effect would be a widening of the climate equity gap.

5. Emissions Targets Jeopardized

Without the IRA, the U.S. may only achieve a 28–30% reduction in GHG emissions by 2030, far short of the 50–52% target pledged under the Paris Agreement. This would not only harm global efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C but would also reduce the credibility of U.S. climate diplomacy. As one of the world’s largest historical emitters, the U.S. holds a leadership responsibility. A failure to meet its targets could discourage other nations from following through on their commitments, unraveling hard-fought progress in international climate negotiations. The diplomatic fallout could also strain transatlantic relations, particularly with the EU, which is already critical of American green industrial subsidies.

Conclusion: The Future of Climate Policy in a Divided America

The Inflation Reduction Act has fundamentally altered the trajectory of U.S. and global climate action. Its potential repeal would represent not just a policy setback, but a systemic shock to the global green economy. However, clean energy momentum and market dynamics suggest that some of the IRA’s effects may endure.

For global ESG leaders, the key takeaway is this: Political volatility is now a material sustainability risk. Strategic planning must account not only for carbon and capital, but also for election cycles, policy reversals, and legislative resilience. The sustainability transition continues, but its path may soon become more uncertain.

Why Work with ASUENE Inc.?

Asuene is a key player in carbon accounting, offering a comprehensive platform that measures, reduces, and reports emissions, including Scope 1-3. Asuene serves over 10,000 clients worldwide, providing an all-in-one solution that integrates GHG accounting, ESG supply chain management, a Carbon Credit exchange platform, and third-party verification.

ASUENE supports companies in achieving net-zero goals through advanced technology, consulting services, and an extensive network.