Introduction

The Environmental Protection Agency has announced that it is rescinding the 2009 Endangerment Finding under the Clean Air Act. Federal officials stated that the prior determination, which concluded that certain greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare, is being formally terminated. Because the Endangerment Finding has served as the legal basis for federal greenhouse gas emissions standards, including vehicle regulations, the announcement directly concerns the scope of federal regulatory authority over climate-related air pollutants.

The decision has drawn attention from lawmakers, state officials, and policy institutions, and it has prompted renewed examination of how climate regulation is structured across the United States. To understand the implications of the announcement, it is necessary to clarify both the legal function of the Endangerment Finding and the role of state-level climate policies within the broader regulatory landscape.

The Legal Role of the Endangerment Finding

In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. EPA that greenhouse gases qualify as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. The Court held that the EPA must determine whether such pollutants endanger public health or welfare. In response, the EPA issued the Endangerment Finding in 2009, concluding that six greenhouse gases meet that standard.

Under the Clean Air Act, an endangerment finding functions as a statutory trigger. Once the agency determines that a pollutant endangers public health or welfare, it is authorized and, in certain contexts, required to regulate emissions of that pollutant. The 2009 finding therefore provided the legal foundation for federal greenhouse gas standards, including vehicle emissions rules and subsequent sector-specific regulations.

By rescinding the Endangerment Finding, the EPA removes that underlying determination. As a result, the statutory basis that has supported federal greenhouse gas regulation under specific provisions of the Clean Air Act is altered, affecting how federal authority over such emissions is defined going forward.

Following the announcement, lawmakers and state officials issued public statements regarding the scope of federal regulatory authority. Some states indicated they are reviewing legal and administrative implications, while others confirmed that existing state climate laws remain in effect.

Comparing State Climate Policy Frameworks

State climate policy varies in statutory targets, market mechanisms, and reporting obligations. The following sections summarize key structural elements.

Statutory Targets and Reporting Frameworks

Market-Based Mechanisms

• California: Multi-sector cap-and-trade program covering major emitters above 25,000 metric tons CO2e; declining allowance budget through 2031.
• Washington: Statewide emissions cap covering emitters above 25,000 metric tons; allowances auctioned quarterly; declining annual cap.
• RGGI: Multi-state cap-and-trade program for power-sector CO2 emissions with a regional cap through 2030.
• TCI (framework stage): Regional transportation-sector cap-and-invest policy development among Northeast and Mid-Atlantic jurisdictions.

Operating in a Multi-Jurisdictional Environment

For companies operating across states, regulatory exposure depends on:

• Presence in jurisdictions with emissions caps.
• Sales or operations in states with disclosure mandates.
• Emissions thresholds triggering reporting obligations.
• Interaction between evolving federal and state requirements.

Maintaining accurate emissions inventories and monitoring legislative developments at both federal and state levels supports compliance preparedness.

Conclusion

The EPA’s rescission of the Endangerment Finding concerns the legal basis for federal greenhouse gas regulation under the Clean Air Act. At the same time, state-level statutes, market mechanisms, and reporting regimes remain in place. Ongoing monitoring of both federal rulemaking and state implementation remains necessary for stakeholders operating within the U.S. regulatory framework.

The EPA’s Endangerment Finding decision marks a significant development in the federal climate policy landscape. However, U.S. climate regulation remains influenced by a broad array of state statutes, market-based mechanisms, and disclosure regimes. Recent reporting and policy analysis indicate that states are reviewing the implications of the federal decision while continuing to operate under their existing legal frameworks.

For stakeholders, the central takeaway is not a single directional shift, but the continued importance of monitoring developments across jurisdictions. Federal policy adjustments may shape national standards, yet state-level initiatives continue to define substantial portions of the regulatory environment.

In a system characterized by evolving federal rulemaking and diverse state programs, informed monitoring and structured emissions management remain essential components of long-term compliance strategy.

Why Work with ASUENE Inc.?

ASUENE is a key player in carbon accounting, offering a comprehensive platform that measures, reduces, and reports emissions. The company serves over 10,000 clients worldwide with an all-in-one solution that integrates GHG accounting, ESG supply chain management, a Carbon Credit exchange platform, and third-party verification.

ASUENE supports companies in achieving net-zero goals through advanced technology, consulting services, and an extensive network.