Overview 

Concrete is the backbone of modern infrastructure. From skyscrapers and highways to bridges and dams, it is everywhere. In fact, concrete is the second most consumed substance on Earth after water. Yet, its contribution to climate change is often underestimated. The cement industry alone accounts for over 7% of global CO2 emissions. As global construction activity increases, particularly in rapidly urbanizing regions and through infrastructure renewal in developed nations, the environmental impact of concrete is under growing scrutiny. This article investigates the full carbon footprint of concrete, from raw material extraction through demolition, and highlights emerging pathways to mitigate its environmental cost.

The Lifecycle Emissions of Concrete

The environmental burden of concrete stems largely from its main ingredient: cement. Producing clinker (the key component of Portland cement) requires heating limestone (calcium carbonate) to over 1,400°C, a process that releases CO2 both from fuel combustion and chemical decomposition (calcination).

• Raw material extraction: Mining of limestone, clay, and aggregates disrupts ecosystems and consumes energy. The process often results in habitat destruction, groundwater contamination, and significant landscape alteration. Dust and particulate matter from quarrying activities also contribute to local air pollution, which can affect the health of nearby communities and ecosystems.
• Clinker production: Responsible for approximately 90% of cement emissions, emitting nearly 0.9 tons of CO2 per ton of clinker produced. Beyond carbon emissions, the energy-intensive process contributes to other pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can lead to acid rain and respiratory problems. High-temperature kilns also consume large amounts of non-renewable fuels, exacerbating environmental degradation.
• Transport and mixing: Emissions accrue from transporting heavy raw materials and finished concrete by trucks and ships, often over long distances. These logistics operations depend largely on diesel fuel, further adding to greenhouse gas emissions and particulate pollution. Batching plants, which mix concrete on-site or near construction zones, also consume electricity and water, increasing the overall resource footprint.
• Construction and use: Although the use phase of concrete structures generates relatively low emissions, the thermal properties of concrete play a role in urban heat island effects. Concrete absorbs and retains heat, leading to elevated temperatures in urban areas, which in turn increases energy demand for cooling and exacerbates local climate change.
• End-of-life: Demolition of concrete structures produces significant dust and particulate emissions, contributing to air pollution and potential health hazards. If waste concrete is not recycled, it typically ends up in landfills, representing a missed opportunity for resource recovery. Unused concrete can also leach alkaline substances into surrounding soil and groundwater, altering local pH balances and potentially harming aquatic ecosystems.

Total cradle-to-grave emissions for concrete can reach 200-500 kg CO2 per cubic meter depending on the specific mix, transportation distances, and energy sources used during production. This substantial carbon footprint, combined with the widespread use of concrete globally, underscores the urgent need for greener alternatives and systemic reform. emissions for concrete can reach 200-500 kg CO2 per cubic meter depending on mix and processes.

Current Mitigation Strategies and Challenges

Efforts to reduce concrete’s carbon footprint are gaining traction, though progress is not without obstacles. A key method is to reduce the amount of clinker used in cement by blending it with other materials like fly ash, slag, or calcined clay. These materials can significantly cut emissions, but supplies are becoming limited as industries that produce them, such as coal power and steel, decline.

Another approach is to capture and store the carbon dioxide emitted during cement production before it escapes into the atmosphere. This technology, known as carbon capture and storage (CCS), is still expensive and used in only a few places so far. Expanding its use will require a lot more investment and support from governments.

Switching to cleaner fuels is another area of progress. Instead of burning coal or petroleum-based fuels in cement kilns, some producers are turning to biomass or waste-derived fuels. These alternatives help reduce emissions, though they sometimes present challenges with supply consistency and combustion quality.

Improving how cement and concrete are made can also make a difference. By updating equipment, using renewable electricity, and designing mixes that use less cement but still perform well, the industry can cut down on unnecessary emissions and waste.

Still, fully decarbonizing concrete is a complex task. Many regions lack the financial resources to invest in greener technology, and certain construction projects require traditional materials for safety or durability reasons. Long-standing habits and inconsistent regulations can also make it harder to adopt new methods quickly.

To truly lower concrete’s carbon impact, the entire industry needs to work together. Governments, manufacturers, designers, and builders all play a part. With the right policies, funding, and innovation, the tools to reduce emissions are already available; they just need to be used more widely and effectively.

Strategy	CO₂ Reduction Potential	Cost	Scalability	Technology Maturity
Clinker Substitution	Medium to High	Low to Medium	Constrained by material availability	High
Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS)	High	High	Limited by infrastructure and cost	Low to Medium
Alternative Fuels	Medium	Medium	Region-dependent	Medium
Production Efficiency	Low to Medium	Low	Widely applicable	High

Regulatory and Market Forces in 2025 and Beyond

Recent regulations are accelerating low-carbon transitions in the concrete industry:

European Union: The 2025 revision of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) imposes more stringent emissions allowances for cement producers and gradually phases out free allowances. In parallel, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which takes full effect in 2026, imposes carbon tariffs on imported cement with higher emissions profiles, incentivizing cleaner domestic production.

United States: Under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), significant tax incentives are provided for clean energy use in manufacturing, including concrete. The federal “Buy Clean” initiative now requires agencies to prioritize low-embodied-carbon construction materials, including concrete, in procurement processes. Additionally, states like California and New York are implementing their own Buy Clean laws with reporting mandates on Global Warming Potential (GWP) of concrete mixes.

United Kingdom: The UK is developing a mandatory embodied carbon disclosure framework under the Building Regulations, expected by 2026, which would apply to large-scale developments and infrastructure projects.

Global Developments: The 2025 Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA) roadmap sets interim targets toward carbon neutrality by 2050. It aligns with Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) standards and supports third-party verification.

Green public procurement policies, harmonized Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), and life cycle assessment requirements are becoming the norm, pushing concrete manufacturers toward transparency and innovation. These shifts are transforming regulatory compliance into a strategic advantage.

Region	Key Regulation	Effective Year	Target	Compliance Mechanism
European Union	EU ETS Revision & CBAM	2025	Reduce emissions via tighter cap & tax imports	Emissions allowances & carbon border tariffs
United States	Inflation Reduction Act & Buy Clean	2023	Promote low-carbon procurement & manufacturing	Federal/state procurement rules, tax credits
United Kingdom	Embodied Carbon Disclosure (Draft)	2026	Mandate embodied carbon reporting	Mandatory reporting under Building Regulations
Global	GCCA Net-Zero Roadmap	2025	Net-zero cement and concrete by 2050	Voluntary targets aligned with SBTi, third-party verification

Future Outlook: Pathways to Zero-Carbon Concrete

While “zero-carbon concrete” remains aspirational, a blend of innovations offers a viable pathway:

• Geopolymer and bio-based concretes: Using waste materials and microbial processes.
• Carbon mineralization: Injecting CO2 during mixing or curing to lock carbon in solid form.
• Digital tools: BIM and AI for optimizing material use and lifecycle impact.

A systems approach involving regulators, industry players, designers, and end-users is essential to transform concrete from climate culprit to climate-conscious material.

Conclusion

Concrete will remain foundational to modern civilization, but its environmental footprint can no longer be ignored. As climate goals tighten and material efficiency becomes imperative, rethinking concrete’s carbon cost is not just an environmental necessity but a business opportunity. By embracing innovation, policy shifts, and circular practices, the industry can reshape its legacy, laying not only the physical but also the sustainable foundation of future cities.

Beyond emissions, addressing the social and environmental justice aspects of concrete production such as pollution impacts on local communities and the degradation of natural landscapes is essential for a truly equitable transition. Encouraging transparency through better data, public reporting, and collaborative benchmarking will strengthen accountability and accelerate industry-wide transformation.

Ultimately, a low-carbon concrete economy will depend not just on technological solutions but on systemic change. It requires a cultural shift in how we design, build, and value the built environment. Education, incentives, and leadership at all levels, public and private, are needed to foster this transition. If successful, the result will be more resilient cities, healthier communities, and a climate-positive legacy for generations to come.

Why Work with ASUENE Inc.?

Asuene is a key player in carbon accounting, offering a comprehensive platform that measures, reduces, and reports emissions, including Scope 1-3, with expertise in decarbonization. Asuene serves over 10,000 clients worldwide, providing an all-in-one solution that integrates GHG accounting, ESG supply chain management, a Carbon Credit exchange platform, and third-party verification.

ASUENE supports companies in achieving net-zero goals through advanced technology, consulting services, and an extensive network.